
Differences in Self‐rated Health by Employment Contract and Household Structure among Japanese Employees: A Nationwide Cross‐sectional Study
Author(s) -
Kachi Yuko,
Inoue Mariko,
Nishikitani Mariko,
Yano Eiji
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
journal of occupational health
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.664
H-Index - 59
ISSN - 1348-9585
DOI - 10.1539/joh.13-0279-oa
Subject(s) - cross sectional study , poverty , logistic regression , demography , household income , medicine , demographic economics , environmental health , psychology , geography , economics , sociology , economic growth , archaeology , pathology
Differences in Self‐rated Health by Employment Contract and Household Structure among Japanese Employees: A Nationwide Cross‐Sectional Study: Yuko KACHI, et al . Department of Hygiene and Public Health, Nippon Medical School—Objectives The aim of this study was to examine whether the association between employment contract and self‐rated health differs by household structure in a representative sample of employees in Japan. Methods The participants were 81,441 male and 64,471 female employees aged 18−59 years who had participated in the 2010 Comprehensive Survey of Living Conditions. We assessed the interactive effect of employment contract (permanent or precarious) and household structure (couple only, couple with children, single parent, single person, or other multi‐person) on fair/poor health, adjusting for covariates by using logistic regression. We then calculated the relative poverty rate by employment contract and household structure. Results The interaction effect was significant for women ( p <0.001) but not for men ( p =0.413). A higher percentage of female precarious workers who lived in single‐parent households (20.2%) reported fair/poor health compared with those in other types of households (10.4−13.2%), although the prevalence of fair/poor health did not differ substantially by household structure among female permanent workers. The relative poverty rates of female precarious workers who lived in singleparent households were higher compared with those of other female workers. Conclusions Our results suggest that female precarious workers are not a homogeneous group and that those living in single‐parent households suffer from poor health due to low income and insufficient coverage by insurance firms and family‐based safety nets.