Open AccessSedentary Risk Factors across Genders and Job Roles within a University Campus Workplace: Preliminary Study
Author(s) -
Alkhatib Ahmad
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
journal of occupational health
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.664
H-Index - 59
ISSN - 1348-9585
DOI - 10.1539/joh.12-0158-oa
Subject(s) - cardiorespiratory fitness , medicine , blood pressure , sedentary lifestyle , risk factor , body fat percentage , demography , body mass index , gerontology , obesity , physical therapy , sociology
Sedentary Risk Factors across Genders and Job Roles within a University Campus Workplace: Preliminary Study: Ahmad ALKHATIB. Department of Life and Sport Science, School of Science, University of Greenwich, UK�Background University campus administrators, predominantly females, are considered more sedentary than academics, which may lead to higher prevalence of associated health risks. Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate whether sedentary job role and gender are reflected by sedentary risk factors within a university campus. Methods Following institutional ethical approval, 80 UK university campus employees were recruited, and 34 of them (age 47.8 � 11.9 years, height 169 � 1.0 cm, body mass 72.0 � 14.1 kg) were measured for their systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), blood glucose (Glu), total serum blood cholesterol (Cho), dominant (DHG) and nondominant handgrip strength (NHG), body fat percentage (Fat%), trunk flexibility (Flex), peak cardiorespiratory capacity (V . O2max), and answered a physical activity questionnaire (IPAQ). The data were analyzed using two‐way ANOVA with job role and gender as independent factors, and each measured risk as a dependent factor. Results Gender had significant effects (p<0.05), and males demonstrated higher Glu, SBP, DBP and BMI than females (p<0.05). Females had higher Flex and Fat%, and lower DHG and NHG (p<0.05). Job role neither affected measured risk factors nor interacted with gender. However, both groups demonstrated high BMI, Fat% and Glu values, with these risk factors being above the recommended healthy thresholds. IPAQ hours correlated positively with Glu (p<0.05) but with none of the remaining tests. Conclusions: Sedentary risk factors are prevalent within university employees irrespective of job role but not irrespective of gender. The results may provide a baseline for initiating tailored organizational targeted policies aimed at reducing sedentary risk factors associated with the university workplace.