z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
JURISDIKCIJA RATIONE PERSONAE TARPTAUTINIAME INVESTICIJŲ ARBITRAŽE –TEISĖTAS VEIKLOS PLANAVIMAS AR PIKTNAUDŽIAVIMAS TEISE?
Author(s) -
Rimantas Daujotas
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
teisė
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2424-6050
pISSN - 1392-1274
DOI - 10.15388/teise.2013.0.1080
Subject(s) - business administration , theology , business , accounting , political science , philosophy
Straipsnyje analizuojama juridinio asmens pilietybė tarptautiniame investicijų arbitraže ir su ja susijusi problematika. Juridinio asmens pilietybė tarptautiniame investicijų arbitraže yra vienas iš svarbiausių aspektų nustatant arbitražo tribunolo jurisdikciją. Tačiau straipsnyje nurodoma, kad susiduriama su piktnaudžiavimo juridinio asmens pilietybės problema.Corporate nationality in investment arbitration was and still is an area of much debate. Thevast net of international investment agreements (IIA’s) had enabled investors to structure and take advantage of the specific IIA’s, which secure their objectives in the host country, byusing shellor socalled “mailboxcompanies.” This process can also be defined as “treatyshopping.” However, such practice had brought a lot of controversy and conflicting views in academic and business society.: justify;"> 

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here