z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Predicting the Working Time of Microtasks Based on Workers' Perception of Prediction Errors
Author(s) -
Susumu Saito,
Charles Chiang,
Saiph Savage,
T. Nakano,
Tetsuo Kobayashi,
Jeffrey P. Bigham
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
human computation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2330-8001
DOI - 10.15346/hc.v6i1.110
Subject(s) - computer science , crowdsourcing , task (project management) , data science , machine learning , artificial intelligence , world wide web , management , economics
Crowd workers struggle to earn adequate wages. Given the limited task-related information provided on crowd platforms, workers often fail to estimate how long it would take to complete certain microtasks. Although there exist a few third-party tools and online communities that provide estimates of working times, such information is limited to microtasks that have been previously completed by other workers, and such tasks are usually booked immediately by experienced workers. This paper presents a computational technique for predicting microtask working times (i.e., how much time it takes to complete microtasks) based on past experiences of workers regarding similar tasks. The following two challenges were addressed during development of the proposed predictive model --- (i) collection of sufficient training data labeled with accurate working times, and (ii) evaluation and optimization of the prediction model. The paper first describes how 7,303 microtask submission data records were collected using a web browser extension --- installed by 83 Amazon Mechanical Turk (AMT) workers --- created for characterization of the diversity of worker behavior to facilitate accurate recording of working times. Next, challenges encountered in defining evaluation and/or objective functions have been described based on the tolerance demonstrated by workers with regard to prediction errors. To this end, surveys were conducted in AMT asking workers how they felt regarding prediction errors in working times pertaining to microtasks simulated using an "imaginary" AI system. Based on 91,060 survey responses submitted by 875 workers, objective/evaluation functions were derived for use in the prediction model to reflect whether or not the calculated prediction errors would be tolerated by workers. Evaluation results based on worker perceptions of prediction errors revealed that the proposed model was capable of predicting worker-tolerable working times in 73.6% of all tested microtask cases. Further, the derived objective function contributed to realization of accurate predictions across microtasks with more diverse durations.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here