z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Genomic Selection in Multi-environment Crop Trials
Author(s) -
Helena Oakey,
B. R. Cullis,
R. Thompson,
Jordi Comadran,
Claire Halpin,
Robbie Waugh
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
g3 genes genomes genetics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.468
H-Index - 66
ISSN - 2160-1836
DOI - 10.1534/g3.116.027524
Subject(s) - genomic selection , selection (genetic algorithm) , replicate , biology , mixed model , linear model , predictive modelling , generalized linear mixed model , computational biology , computer science , statistics , machine learning , genetics , mathematics , single nucleotide polymorphism , gene , genotype
Genomic selection in crop breeding introduces modeling challenges not found in animal studies. These include the need to accommodate replicate plants for each line, consider spatial variation in field trials, address line by environment interactions, and capture nonadditive effects. Here, we propose a flexible single-stage genomic selection approach that resolves these issues. Our linear mixed model incorporates spatial variation through environment-specific terms, and also randomization-based design terms. It considers marker, and marker by environment interactions using ridge regression best linear unbiased prediction to extend genomic selection to multiple environments. Since the approach uses the raw data from line replicates, the line genetic variation is partitioned into marker and nonmarker residual genetic variation (i.e., additive and nonadditive effects). This results in a more precise estimate of marker genetic effects. Using barley height data from trials, in 2 different years, of up to 477 cultivars, we demonstrate that our new genomic selection model improves predictions compared to current models. Analyzing single trials revealed improvements in predictive ability of up to 5.7%. For the multiple environment trial (MET) model, combining both year trials improved predictive ability up to 11.4% compared to a single environment analysis. Benefits were significant even when fewer markers were used. Compared to a single-year standard model run with 3490 markers, our partitioned MET model achieved the same predictive ability using between 500 and 1000 markers depending on the trial. Our approach can be used to increase accuracy and confidence in the selection of the best lines for breeding and/or, to reduce costs by using fewer markers.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom