z-logo
Premium
The DNA damage response acts as a safeguard against harmful DNA–RNA hybrids of different origins
Author(s) -
Barroso Sonia,
HerreraMoyano Emilia,
Muñoz Sergio,
GarcíaRubio María,
GómezGonzález Belén,
Aguilera Andrés
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
embo reports
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 4.584
H-Index - 184
eISSN - 1469-3178
pISSN - 1469-221X
DOI - 10.15252/embr.201847250
Subject(s) - humanities , biology , library science , art , computer science
Despite playing physiological roles in specific situations, DNA – RNA hybrids threat genome integrity. To investigate how cells do counteract spontaneous DNA – RNA hybrids, here we screen an si RNA library covering 240 human DNA damage response ( DDR ) genes and select si RNA s causing DNA – RNA hybrid accumulation and a significant increase in hybrid‐dependent DNA breakage. We identify post‐replicative repair and DNA damage checkpoint factors, including those of the ATM / CHK 2 and ATR / CHK 1 pathways. Thus, spontaneous DNA – RNA hybrids are likely a major source of replication stress, but they can also accumulate and menace genome integrity as a consequence of unrepaired DSB s and post‐replicative ss DNA gaps in normal cells. We show that DNA – RNA hybrid accumulation correlates with increased DNA damage and chromatin compaction marks. Our results suggest that different mechanisms can lead to DNA – RNA hybrids with distinct consequences for replication and DNA dynamics at each cell cycle stage and support the conclusion that DNA – RNA hybrids are a common source of spontaneous DNA damage that remains unsolved under a deficient DDR .

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom