z-logo
Premium
Nonbiologic Objects as Actors
Author(s) -
Owens Erica
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
symbolic interaction
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.874
H-Index - 47
eISSN - 1533-8665
pISSN - 0195-6086
DOI - 10.1525/si.2007.30.4.567
Subject(s) - counterintuitive , object (grammar) , action (physics) , perception , process (computing) , warrant , task (project management) , computer science , psychology , cognitive science , epistemology , social psychology , cognitive psychology , artificial intelligence , business , philosophy , physics , management , finance , quantum mechanics , economics , operating system , neuroscience
We generally understand interactions between human actors and nonbiologic objects (NBOs) as being indirect, with the human actor acting for the NBO and using the NBO as a “thing.” Under certain circumstances, however, human actors enter into direct interaction with NBOs and take on extra work in this process. Actors must “do mind” for the nonbiologic other to perceive “another” with whom it is possible to interact. The fiction that mind can exist where thought cannot be present is counterintuitive, making this process tenuous and heavily dependent upon the circumstances at hand. Four successive contingencies must be present to make possible the perceptual shift from object to actor. First, the actor must perceive the object in question as capable of independent action, whether or not the human actor initiates said action. Second, this separate and active status must become apparent through actions that threaten the human actor's desired goals. Third, these goals must be of sufficient urgency to warrant continuing in direct interaction with the object rather than reverting to nonanthropomorphized normal interaction. Finally, the object at hand must be necessary for completing the desired task.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here