Premium
Mutual Interests, Different Lenses: Current Neuroscience and Symbolic Interaction
Author(s) -
Franks David D.
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
symbolic interaction
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.874
H-Index - 47
eISSN - 1533-8665
pISSN - 0195-6086
DOI - 10.1525/si.2003.26.4.613
Subject(s) - embodied cognition , salience (neuroscience) , cognitive science , cognitive neuroscience , consciousness , cognition , perception , psychology , the symbolic , unconscious mind , illusion , symbolic communication , cognitive psychology , divergence (linguistics) , neuroscience , epistemology , philosophy , archaeology , psychoanalysis , history , linguistics
As reflective thinkers, symbolic interactionists may well be curious about the organ with which we think. Leading neuroscientists are quite aware that a working brain depends on other brains. This article considers selected neuroscience approaches to topics traditionally addressed by symbolic interactionists including some confirmations, refinements, and challenges from current neuroscience. Confirmations support features of Mead's “objective reality of perspectives” and a relational epistemology, the inevitability of ad hoc “accounts,” self‐consciousness as behavioral control, and “self unity” as constantly re‐created illusion. Divergence between neuroscience and symbolic interaction mainly involves new evidence for the importance of unconscious cognition, emotion, and memory in shaping human behavior. The rooting of cognitive and perceptual processes in motor activity challenges the extremes of the “linguistic turn.” Refinement involves reasons for attending to the embodied salience of thoughts produced by “somatic markers” rather than mere content.