Premium
Symbolic Interactionism and Psychoanalysis: Some Convergences, Divergences, and Complementarities *
Author(s) -
Elliott Rodney D.,
Meltzer Bernard N.
Publication year - 1981
Publication title -
symbolic interaction
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.874
H-Index - 47
eISSN - 1533-8665
pISSN - 0195-6086
DOI - 10.1525/si.1981.4.2.225
Subject(s) - symbolic interactionism , socialization , sociology , epistemology , eclecticism , interactionism , perspective (graphical) , psychoanalytic theory , action (physics) , rubric , psychology , social science , psychoanalysis , computer science , philosophy , pedagogy , physics , theology , quantum mechanics , artificial intelligence
In spite of a number of fundamental contrasts between the assumptions and methodologies of symbolic interactionist and psychoanalytic theories of social interaction in general and socialization in particular, the two perspectives embrace several common interpretations of human action. Moreover, many of the divergences can be appreciated as complementing, rather than contradicting, each other. Some of the more important convergences and complementarities, as well as unresolved differences, are noted and briefly treated under four broad rubrics: (1) human nature and human habitat; (2) the nature and stages of socialization; (3) the structure and functions of personality; and (4) the nature of social relationships. The points of synthesis implied by the complementarities between the two perspectives do not necessarily lead to eclecticism. On the other hand, such syntheses can enhance the analytical power of each perspective.