Premium
THEORY AND METHOD IN STATUS ATTAINMENT RESEARCH *
Author(s) -
Haas David F.,
Falk William W.
Publication year - 1981
Publication title -
symbolic interaction
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.874
H-Index - 47
eISSN - 1533-8665
pISSN - 0195-6086
DOI - 10.1525/si.1981.4.1.59
Subject(s) - symbolic interactionism , interpretation (philosophy) , contradiction , status attainment , epistemology , causality (physics) , the symbolic , sociology , social psychology , sociological theory , psychology , linguistics , psychoanalysis , philosophy , socioeconomic status , population , physics , demography , quantum mechanics
This paper analyzes a contradiction between theory and method in status attainment research. The authors argue that the Meadian social psychology adopted by the status attainment researchers is incompatible with causal modeling which they use as their principal analytic tool, because Mead's ideas are inconsistent with any method which assumes unidirectional causality. A symbolic interactionist interpretation of the process of status attainment is offered in place of the causal interpretation. The symbolic interactionist interpretation removes the contradiction between theory and method and is, in addition, shown to be compatible with current sociological knowledge of the process of education. Finally, it is argued that the symbolic interactionist interpretation is also compatible with American political language, while the causal interpretation is not, and that therefore the adoption of the symbolic interactionist interpretation would permit the findings of status attainment research to speak to the question of the degree of equality of opportunity in American society as that question is asked in American politics.