Open AccessActivist Research v. Cultural Critique: Indigenous Land Rights and the Contradictions of Politically Engaged Anthropology
Author(s) -
Hale Charles R.
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
cultural anthropology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.669
H-Index - 75
eISSN - 1548-1360
pISSN - 0886-7356
DOI - 10.1525/can.2006.21.1.96
Subject(s) - indigenous , ethnography , politics , sociology , human rights , latin americans , political anthropology , argument (complex analysis) , context (archaeology) , government (linguistics) , land rights , indigenous rights , anthropology , political science , law , environmental ethics , gender studies , ethnology , history , ecology , biology , biochemistry , chemistry , linguistics , philosophy , archaeology
With indigenous and Afro‐Latin land rights in Central America as ethnographic context, this article makes the case for politically engaged anthropology. The argument builds from a juxtaposition between “cultural critique” and “activist research” distinguished mainly on methodological grounds. Activist scholars establish an alignment with an organized group of people in struggle and accompany them on the contradictory and partly compromised path toward their political goals. This yields research outcomes that are both troubled and deeply enriched by direct engagement with the complexities of political contention. A case in the Inter‐American Human Rights Court, where an indigenous community called Awas Tingni forced the Nicaraguan government to recognize the community's ancestral lands, illustrates the promise of activist research, in spite of the inevitable contradictions that present themselves even when the struggle is ostensibly successful.