
Just Writing: Paradox and Political Economy in Yemeni Legal Documents
Author(s) -
Messick Brinkley
Publication year - 1989
Publication title -
cultural anthropology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.669
H-Index - 75
eISSN - 1548-1360
pISSN - 0886-7356
DOI - 10.1525/can.1989.4.1.02a00020
Subject(s) - politics , citation , sociology , law , political science
One of the most revealing of Muslim doctrines about writing concerns the rather mundane and narrow genre of legal documents. As articulated by early jurists, the doctrine held that such writings as contracts and other private legal documents had no evidential value. According to the classical rules of evidence in Islamic law, written documents could not be brought forward in a legal proceedings as proof of a claim. Evidence, as defined by the jurists, was exclusively oral, anchored in the spoken testimony of present, upright witnesses. This nonrecognition of the evidence value of written documents is remarkable both because it