Premium
Stone Tools, Style, and Social Identity: an Evolutionary Perspective on the Archaeological Record
Author(s) -
Barton C. Michael
Publication year - 1997
Publication title -
archeological papers of the american anthropological association
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.783
H-Index - 30
eISSN - 1551-8248
pISSN - 1551-823X
DOI - 10.1525/ap3a.1997.7.1.141
Subject(s) - archaeological record , style (visual arts) , identity (music) , social identity theory , tracing , descendant , prehistory , perspective (graphical) , archaeology , paleoanthropology , sociocultural evolution , identification (biology) , social group , darwinism , knapping , anthropology , geography , sociology , evolutionary biology , computer science , ecology , aesthetics , biology , artificial intelligence , art , social science , physics , astronomy , operating system
Because of their prevalence in the archaeological record, chipped stone assemblages have long been used for the identification of social entities and the tracing of cultural relationships through space and time. To do this, archaeologists have focused primarily on variations in lithic morphology. Although the forms of stone artifacts are determined by a combination their utilitarian function, 'style', and the physical constraints of knapping different cryptocrystalline rocks, there is widespread belief that style provides the best information about social group membership. Style, however, is not a unified concept, including both passive variability resulting from stochastic processes and actively encoded social information, constrained by selection and manipulated by the makers and users of artifacts. A neo‐Darwinian framework is used to evaluate differing concepts of style and their applicability to the lithic archaeological record. Identifying prehistoric social entities and tracing cultural relationships is loosely analogous, methodologically and theoretically, to identifying taxa and tracing ancestor/descendant relationships in biology. Lithic technology is also examined from the point of view of neo‐Darwinian evolutionary theory to identity sources of morphological variability most likely to mark group social identity, and suggest methodologies best able to identify and differentiate prehistoric social groups.