Premium
methodology and the misinterpretation of women's status in kinship studies: a case study of Goodenough and the definition of marriage
Author(s) -
LEONARDO MICAELA
Publication year - 1979
Publication title -
american ethnologist
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.875
H-Index - 78
eISSN - 1548-1425
pISSN - 0094-0496
DOI - 10.1525/ae.1979.6.4.02a00010
Subject(s) - kinship , ethnography , interpretation (philosophy) , sociology , sample (material) , epistemology , anthropology , gender studies , linguistics , philosophy , chemistry , chromatography
This paper examines the ethnographic sources that Ward Goodenough (1970) uses to support and illustrate his assumption that women's low status is universally unproblematic, an assumption that is central to his construction of a cross‐cultural definition of marriage. The examination reveals that the sources are a poor ethnographic sample and, further, that Goodenough's assumption flaws his interpretation of the ethnographic data. The paper concludes that Goodenough's definition of marriage does not correspond to the evidence of his own sources, suggests that other models of kinship processes may be similarly inadequate, and calls for the use of appropriate methodology in the future construction of such models