
Reconsidering Osmond
Author(s) -
Charles Noonan
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
victoria university law and justice journal/victoria university law and justice journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2202-7912
pISSN - 2203-2908
DOI - 10.15209/vulj.v8i1.1140
Subject(s) - law , obligation , political science , high court , duty , foundation (evidence) , natural (archaeology) , history , archaeology
Over thirty years has now passed since the High Court of Australia held in Public Service Board (NSW) v Osmond that the common law imposes no obligation on administrative decision-makers to provide reasons for their decisions. Despite this, significant developments made in Australian administrative law since Osmond was decided may in fact cause major difficulties to a rule that has survived the past thirty years largely unscathed. In particular, this paper demonstrates that although the emergence of Li unreasonableness is unlikely to give rise to a common law duty to provide reasons, the principles of natural justice provide a solid doctrinal foundation for the High Court to reconsider the position expressed in Osmond.