z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Reconsidering Osmond
Author(s) -
Charles Noonan
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
victoria university law and justice journal/victoria university law and justice journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2202-7912
pISSN - 2203-2908
DOI - 10.15209/vulj.v8i1.1140
Subject(s) - law , obligation , political science , high court , duty , foundation (evidence) , natural (archaeology) , history , archaeology
Over thirty years has now passed since the High Court of Australia held in Public Service Board (NSW) v Osmond that the common law imposes no obligation on administrative decision-makers to provide reasons for their decisions. Despite this, significant developments made in Australian administrative law since Osmond was decided may in fact cause major difficulties to a rule that has survived the past thirty years largely unscathed. In particular, this paper demonstrates that although the emergence of Li unreasonableness is unlikely to give rise to a common law duty to provide reasons, the principles of natural justice provide a solid doctrinal foundation for the High Court to reconsider the position expressed in Osmond. 

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here