Reconsidering Osmond
Author(s) -
Charles Noonan
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
victoria university law and justice journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2203-2908
pISSN - 2202-7912
DOI - 10.15209/vulj.v8i1.1140
Subject(s) - law , obligation , political science , high court , duty , foundation (evidence) , natural (archaeology) , history , archaeology
Over thirty years has now passed since the High Court of Australia held in Public Service Board (NSW) v Osmond that the common law imposes no obligation on administrative decision-makers to provide reasons for their decisions. Despite this, significant developments made in Australian administrative law since Osmond was decided may in fact cause major difficulties to a rule that has survived the past thirty years largely unscathed. In particular, this paper demonstrates that although the emergence of Li unreasonableness is unlikely to give rise to a common law duty to provide reasons, the principles of natural justice provide a solid doctrinal foundation for the High Court to reconsider the position expressed in Osmond.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom