
The Influence of Blood Lactate Sample Site on Exercise Prescription
Author(s) -
Paul Moran,
Jonathan Prichard,
Les Ansley,
Glyn Howatson
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
journal of strength and conditioning research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.569
H-Index - 128
eISSN - 1533-4287
pISSN - 1064-8011
DOI - 10.1519/jsc.0b013e318225f395
Subject(s) - earlobe , blood lactate , exercise prescription , heart rate , lactate threshold , cycle ergometer , anaerobic exercise , medicine , cardiology , zoology , physical therapy , surgery , biology , blood pressure
The aims of this study were first to determine the level of agreement between the fingertip and earlobe for the measurement of blood lactate, and second, to examine whether these sample sites may be used interchangeably when distinguishing lactate parameters routinely used in the physiological assessment and exercise prescription. Twenty healthy men performed an incremental cycle ergometry step test. Capillary blood samples were taken simultaneously at the end of each increment from the earlobe and the fingertip to determine blood lactate concentration. The power output and the heart rate at different lactate parameters (LT, LT1, 2, and 4 mMol·L(-1)) were calculated from the lactate values. The average bias in blood lactate concentration measured from the fingertip and the earlobe was 9.2% with 95% of measures differing by between -24.9 and 58.7%. There were no significant differences between sample sites (p = 0.201); however, there was a strong positive relationship (R2 = 0.9455). At the different lactate parameters, there were no differences in determining the heart rate (except at 4 mMol·L(-1) [p = 0.028], equating to 2 b·min(-1)) and power output between sample sites. In conclusion, this high level of agreement and negligible differences in prescribing exercise using power output and heart rate from commonly used lactate parameters, determined from the earlobe and the fingertip indicate that these sample sites could be used interchangeably for physiological assessment during cycle ergometry.