z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
DEVELOPMENT OF A SUBMAXIMAL TEST TO PREDICT ELLIPTICAL CROSS-TRAINER &OV0312;O2MAX
Author(s) -
Lance C. Dalleck,
Len Kravitz,
Robert A. Robergs
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
journal of strength and conditioning research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.569
H-Index - 128
eISSN - 1533-4287
pISSN - 1064-8011
DOI - 10.1519/00124278-200605000-00008
Subject(s) - trainer , step test , standard error , mathematics , cardiorespiratory fitness , medicine , zoology , statistics , physical therapy , significant difference , computer science , biology , programming language
The purpose of this study was to develop an equation to predict V̇O2max from a submaximal elliptical cross-trainer test. Fifty-four apparently healthy subjects (25 men and 29 women, mean ± *SD* age: 29.5 ± 7.1 years, height: 173.3 ± 12.6 cm, weight: 72.3 ± 7.9 kg, percent body fat: 17.3 ± 5.0%, and elliptical cross-trainer V̇O2max: 43.9 ± 7.2 ml·kg-1·min-1) participated in the study and were randomly assigned to an original sample group (*n* = 40) and a cross-validation group (*n* = 14). Each subject completed an elliptical cross-trainer submaximal (3 5-minute submaximal stages) and a V̇O2max test on the same day, with a 15-minute rest period in between. Stepwise multiple regression analyses were used to develop an equation for estimating elliptical cross-trainer V̇O2max from the data of the original sample group. The accuracy of the equation was tested by using data from the cross-validation group. Because there was no shrinkage in R2 between the original sample group and the cross-validation group, data were combined in the final prediction equation (R2 = 0.732, standard error of the estimate = 3.91 ml·kg-1·min-1, *p* < 0.05): V̇O2max = 73.676 + 7.383(gender) - 0.317(weight) + 0.003957(age·cadence) - 0.006452(age·heart rate at stage 2). The correlation coefficient between the predicted and measured V̇O2max values was *r* = 0.86. Dependent t-tests resulted in no significant differences (*p* > 0.05) between predicted (43.8 ml·kg-1·min-1) and measured (43.9 ml·kg-1·min-1) V̇O2max measurements. Results indicate that the protocol and equation developed in the current study can be used by exercise professionals to provide acceptably accurate estimates of V̇O2max in non-laboratory-based settings

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here