z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Indigenous Knowledge and Ethics
Author(s) -
Linda Scarangella
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
journal of anthropology at mcmaster
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 0707-3771
DOI - 10.15173/nexus.v17i1.191
Subject(s) - misrepresentation , indigenous , reciprocity (cultural anthropology) , autonomy , traditional knowledge , government (linguistics) , environmental ethics , political science , sociology , public relations , social science , law , ecology , linguistics , philosophy , biology
Academics, corporations, and government agencies have begun to take greater interest in conducting Indigenous Knowledge (lK) research in response to environmental issues and failures of "development projects." Indigenous scholars and communities, however, are concerned about how these research projects may affect their communities and goals towards autonomy. In order to protect their IK and minimize the possibility for misrepresentation and/or misuse, some communities insist on equal control and participation in the entire research project. This article examines the debates surrounding the definition and use of lK. I then explore a research framework based on "relationships" as one possible model that may address indigenous concerns about control, authorship, ownership, and benefits. I discuss two variations of a relationship model: one based on "reciprocity,'" the other on "covenants." I conclude that a collaborative relationship research model complements indigenous expectations and conceptions of research and begins to address indigenous concerns.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here