
Priority and Unity in Frege and Wittgenstein
Author(s) -
Oliver Thomas Spinney
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
the journal for the history of analytical philosophy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2159-0303
DOI - 10.15173/jhap.v6i5.3351
Subject(s) - proposition , philosophy , epistemology , metaphor , focus (optics) , extension (predicate logic) , philosophy of language , linguistics , metaphysics , computer science , physics , optics , programming language
In the following article I intend to examine the problem of the unity of the proposition in Russell, Frege, and Wittgenstein. My chief aim will be to draw attention to the distinction between Russell’s conception of propositional constituents, on the one hand, with Frege and Wittgenstein’s on the other. My focus will be on Russell’s view of terms as independent, propositions being built up out of these building blocks, compared with Frege and Wittgenstein’s ‘top down’ approach. Furthermore, I will argue that, contra certain other commentators, Frege’s metaphor of saturation and unsaturation does not serve as a solution to the problem of unity, and that the extension of this metaphorical language to Wittgenstein is, therefore, inappropriate.