z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Is the Precariat a Class?
Author(s) -
Erik Olín Wright
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
global labour journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 1918-6711
DOI - 10.15173/glj.v7i2.2583
Subject(s) - precarity , livelihood , marxist philosophy , working class , class (philosophy) , sociology , gender studies , political economy , political science , law , history , epistemology , politics , philosophy , archaeology , agriculture
Precariousness is a pervasive and increasing condition of life in both the developed and less developed regions of the world. Guy Standing has proposed a reconceptualisation of these trends from precarity as a condition to the precariat as a class distinct from the working class. This article presents a Marxist critique of this reconceptualisation on two principle grounds: first, that the material interests of people in the precariat and in the working class are not sufficiently opposed to each other for these to constitute two distinct classes; and second, that across the various segments of the precariat the optimal strategies for securing a livelihood are not sufficiently unified for the precariat as a whole to constitute a class.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom