Open AccessCOVID-19 versus Non–COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Comparison of Demographics, Physiologic Parameters, Inflammatory Biomarkers, and Clinical Outcomes
Author(s) -
William Bain,
Haopu Yang,
Faraaz Shah,
Tomeka Suber,
Callie Drohan,
Nameer Al-Yousif,
Rebecca DeSensi,
N. Bensen,
Caitlin Schaefer,
Brian R. Rosborough,
Ashwin Somasundaram,
Creg J. Workman,
Caleb Lampenfeld,
Anthony R. Cillo,
Carly Cardello,
Feng Shan,
Tullia C. Bruno,
Dario A.A. Vignali,
Prabir Ray,
Anuradha Ray,
Yingze Zhang,
Janet Lee,
Barbara Methé,
Bryan J. McVerry,
Alison Morris,
Georgios D Kitsios
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
annals of the american thoracic society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.035
H-Index - 114
eISSN - 2329-6933
pISSN - 2325-6621
DOI - 10.1513/annalsats.202008-1026oc
Subject(s) - ards , medicine , pneumonia , prospective cohort study , mechanical ventilation , cohort , intensive care medicine , diffuse alveolar damage , lung , acute respiratory distress
Rationale: There is an urgent need for improved understanding of the mechanisms and clinical characteristics of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Objectives: To compare key demographic and physiologic parameters, biomarkers, and clinical outcomes of COVID-19 ARDS and ARDS secondary to direct lung injury from other etiologies of pneumonia. Methods: We enrolled 27 patients with COVID-19 ARDS in a prospective, observational cohort study and compared them with a historical, pre-COVID-19 cohort of patients with viral ARDS ( n = 14), bacterial ARDS ( n = 21), and ARDS due to culture-negative pneumonia ( n = 30). We recorded clinical demographics; measured respiratory mechanical parameters; collected serial peripheral blood specimens for measurement of plasma interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, and IL-10; and followed patients prospectively for patient-centered outcomes. We conducted between-group comparisons with nonparametric tests and analyzed time-to-event outcomes with Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models. Results: Patients with COVID-19 ARDS had higher body mass index and were more likely to be Black, or residents of skilled nursing facilities, compared with those with non-COVID-19 ARDS ( P < 0.05). Patients with COVID-19 had lower delivered minute ventilation compared with bacterial and culture-negative ARDS ( post hoc P < 0.01) but not compared with viral ARDS. We found no differences in static compliance, hypoxemic indices, or carbon dioxide clearance between groups. Patients with COVID-19 had lower IL-6 levels compared with bacterial and culture-negative ARDS at early time points after intubation but no differences in IL-6 levels compared with viral ARDS. Patients with COVID-19 had longer duration of mechanical ventilation but similar 60-day mortality in both unadjusted and adjusted analyses. Conclusions: COVID-19 ARDS bears several similarities to viral ARDS but demonstrates lower minute ventilation and lower systemic levels of IL-6 compared with bacterial and culture-negative ARDS. COVID-19 ARDS was associated with longer dependence on mechanical ventilation compared with non-COVID-19 ARDS. Such detectable differences of COVID-19 do not merit deviation from evidence-based management of ARDS but suggest priorities for clinical research to better characterize and treat this new clinical entity.