Open AccessCan multi-stakeholder forums influence good governance in communal forest management? Lessons from two case studies in Ethiopia
Author(s) -
Mastewal Yami,
Juan Pablo Sarmiento Barletti,
Anita Larson
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
international forestry review
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.526
H-Index - 48
eISSN - 2053-7778
pISSN - 1465-5489
DOI - 10.1505/146554821833466040
Subject(s) - corporate governance , government (linguistics) , stakeholder , deforestation (computer science) , business , enforcement , environmental resource management , political science , economics , public relations , linguistics , philosophy , finance , computer science , law , programming language
Following global trends, Multi-Stakeholder Forums (MSFs) have received attention as mechanisms for addressing deforestation and forest degradation in Ethiopia. However, little is understood on their influence on governance of forests. Based on qualitative research conducted in MSFs organized at Bale and Jamma-Urji in Oromia, Ethiopia, this paper examines how MSFs may influence the governance of communal forests. Results indicate that the majority of informants believe that MSFs improve participation, facilitate collaboration across sectors, and have potential to address power imbalances among stakeholders. Yet, failing to substantially engage the government in MSFs could either lower the success of the MSFs in bringing change in the governance of communal forests or limit the changes to the local community level. Embedding MSFs in government structures could increase the enforcement of MSF outcomes and enable resource mobilization. However, caution is required to prevent the government's control over MSF processes and outcomes.