Open AccessVentilation–perfusion heterogeneity measured by the multiple inert gas elimination technique is minimally affected by intermittent breathing of 100% O 2
Author(s) -
Elliott Ann R.,
Kizhakke Puliyakote Abhilash S.,
Tedjasaputra Vincent,
Pazár Beni,
Wagner Harrieth,
Sá Rui C.,
Orr Jeremy E.,
Prisk G. Kim,
Wagner Peter D.,
Hopkins Susan R.
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
physiological reports
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.918
H-Index - 39
ISSN - 2051-817X
DOI - 10.14814/phy2.14488
Subject(s) - ventilation (architecture) , nuclear medicine , perfusion , medicine , breathing , anesthesia , materials science , cardiology , physics , thermodynamics
Proton magnetic resonance (MR) imaging to quantify regional ventilation–perfusion (V ˙ A / Q ˙ ) ratios combines specific ventilation imaging (SVI) and separate proton density and perfusion measures into a composite map. Specific ventilation imaging exploits the paramagnetic properties of O 2 , which alters the local MR signal intensity, in an F I O 2 ‐dependent manner. Specific ventilation imaging data are acquired during five wash‐in/wash‐out cycles of breathing 21% O 2 alternating with 100% O 2 over ~20 min. This technique assumes that alternating F I O 2 does not affectV ˙ A / Q ˙heterogeneity, but this is unproven. We tested the hypothesis that alternating F I O 2 exposure increasesV ˙ A / Q ˙mismatch in nine patients with abnormal pulmonary gas exchange and increasedV ˙ A / Q ˙mismatch using the multiple inert gas elimination technique (MIGET).The following data were acquired (a) breathing air (baseline), (b) breathing alternating air/100% O 2 during an emulated‐SVI protocol (eSVI), and (c) 20 min after ambient air breathing (recovery). MIGET heterogeneity indices of shunt, deadspace, ventilation versusV ˙ A / Q ˙ratio, LogSD V ˙ , and perfusion versusV ˙ A / Q ˙ratio, LogSD Q ˙ were calculated. LogSD V ˙ was not different between eSVI and baseline (1.04 ± 0.39 baseline, 1.05 ± 0.38 eSVI, p = .84); but was reduced compared to baseline during recovery (0.97 ± 0.39, p = .04). There was no significant difference in LogSD Q ˙ across conditions (0.81 ± 0.30 baseline, 0.79 ± 0.15 eSVI, 0.79 ± 0.20 recovery; p = .54); Deadspace was not significantly different ( p = .54) but shunt showed a borderline increase during eSVI (1.0% ± 1.0 baseline, 2.6% ± 2.9 eSVI; p = .052) likely from altered hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction and/or absorption atelectasis. Intermittent breathing of 100% O 2 does not substantially alterV ˙ A / Q ˙matching and if SVI measurements are made after perfusion measurements, any potential effects will be minimized.