z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Synaptic GABAergic transmission in the central amygdala (CeA) of rats depends on slice preparation and recording conditions
Author(s) -
Avegno Elizabeth M.,
Middleton Jason W.,
Gilpin Nicholas W.
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
physiological reports
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.918
H-Index - 39
ISSN - 2051-817X
DOI - 10.14814/phy2.14245
Subject(s) - center of excellence , health science , excellence , library science , neuroscience , medicine , gerontology , psychology , political science , medical education , law , computer science
The central nucleus of the amygdala (CeA) is a primarily GABAergic brain region implicated in stress and addictive disorders. Using in vitro slice electrophysiology, many studies measure GABAergic neurotransmission to evaluate the impact of experimental manipulations on inhibitory tone in the CeA, as a measure of alterations in CeA activity and function. In a recent study, we reported spontaneous inhibitory postsynaptic current (sIPSC) frequencies higher than those typically reported in CeA neurons in the literature, despite utilizing similar recording protocols and internal recording solutions. The purpose of this study was to systematically evaluate two common methods of slice preparation, an NMDG‐based aCSF perfusion method and an ice‐cold sucrose solution, as well as the use of an in‐line heater to control recording temperature, on measures of intrinsic excitability and spontaneous inhibitory neurotransmission in CeA neurons. We report that both slice preparation and recording conditions significantly impact spontaneous GABAergic transmission in CeA neurons, and that recording temperature, but not slicing solution, alters measures of intrinsic excitability in CeA neurons. Bath application of corticotropin‐releasing factor (CRF) increased sIPSC frequency under all conditions, but the magnitude of this effect was significantly different across recording conditions that elicited different baseline GABAergic transmission. Furthermore, CRF effects on synaptic transmission differed according to data reporting methods (i.e., raw vs. normalized data), which is important to consider in relation to baseline synaptic transmission values. These studies highlight the impact of experimental conditions and data reporting methods on neuronal excitability and synaptic transmission in the CeA.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here