z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Effect of type 2 diabetes, surgical incision, and volatile anesthesia on hemodynamics in the rat
Author(s) -
Bussey Carol T.,
Lamberts Regis R.
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
physiological reports
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.918
H-Index - 39
ISSN - 2051-817X
DOI - 10.14814/phy2.13352
Subject(s) - medicine , anesthesia , hemodynamics , perioperative , isoflurane , blood pressure , mean arterial pressure , type 2 diabetes , diabetes mellitus , heart rate , baroreflex , endocrinology
Diabetic patients have increased cardiac complications during surgery, possibly due to impaired autonomic regulation. Anesthesia lowers blood pressure and heart rate ( HR ), whereas surgical intervention has opposing effects. The interaction of anesthesia and surgical intervention on hemodynamics in diabetes is unknown, despite being a potential perioperative risk factor. We aimed to determine the effect of diabetes on the integrative interaction between hemodynamics, anesthesia, and surgical incision. Zucker type 2 diabetic rats ( DM ) and their nondiabetic littermates ( ND ) were implanted with an intravenous port for drug delivery, and a radiotelemeter to measure mean arterial blood pressure ( MAP ) and derive HR (total n  = 50). Hemodynamic pharmacological responses were assessed under conscious, isoflurane anesthesia (~2–2.5%), and anesthesia–surgical conditions; the latter performed as a laparotomy. MAP was not different between groups under conscious conditions ( ND 120 ± 6 vs. DM 131 ± 4 mmHg, P >  0.05). Anesthesia reduced MAP , but not differently in DM ( ND −30 ± 6 vs. DM −38 ± 4 ΔmmHg, P >  0.05). Despite adequate anesthesia, surgical incision increased MAP , which tended to be less in DM ( ND +21 ± 4 vs. DM +13 ± 2 ΔmmHg, P =  0.052). Anesthesia disrupted central baroreflex HR responses to sympathetic activation (sodium nitroprusside 10  μ g·kg −1 , ND conscious 83 ± 13 vs. anesthetized 16 ± 5 Δbpm; P  <   0.05) or to sympathetic withdrawal (phenylephrine 10  μ g·kg −1 , ND conscious −168 ± 37 vs. anesthetized −20 ± 6 Δbpm; P  <   0.05) with no additional changes observed after surgical incision or during diabetes. During perioperative conditions, type 2 diabetes did not impact on short‐term hemodynamic regulation. Anesthesia had the largest hemodynamic impact, whereas surgical effects were limited to modulation of baseline blood pressure.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here