z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Task complexity and maximal isometric strength gains through motor learning
Author(s) -
McGuire Jessica,
Green Lara A.,
Gabriel David A.
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
physiological reports
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.918
H-Index - 39
ISSN - 2051-817X
DOI - 10.14814/phy2.12218
Subject(s) - isometric exercise , coactivation , wrist , contraction (grammar) , mathematics , muscle contraction , electromyography , medicine , physical medicine and rehabilitation , physical therapy , anatomy
This study compared the effects of a simple versus complex contraction pattern on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of maximal isometric strength gains and reductions in force variability. A control group ( N  = 12) performed simple isometric contractions of the wrist flexors. An experimental group ( N  = 12) performed complex proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) contractions consisting of maximal isometric wrist extension immediately reversing force direction to wrist flexion within a single trial. Ten contractions were completed on three consecutive days with a retention and transfer test 2‐weeks later. For the retention test, the groups performed their assigned contraction pattern followed by a transfer test that consisted of the other contraction pattern for a cross‐over design. Both groups exhibited comparable increases in strength (20.2%, P  < 0.01) and reductions in mean torque variability (26.2%, P  < 0.01), which were retained and transferred. There was a decrease in the coactivation ratio (antagonist/agonist muscle activity) for both groups, which was retained and transferred (35.2%, P  < 0.01). The experimental group exhibited a linear decrease in variability of the torque‐ and sEMG ‐time curves, indicating transfer to the simple contraction pattern ( P  < 0.01). The control group underwent a decrease in variability of the torque‐ and sEMG ‐time curves from the first day of training to retention, but participants returned to baseline levels during the transfer condition ( P  < 0.01). However, the difference between torque RMS error versus the variability in torque‐ and sEMG ‐time curves suggests the demands of the complex task were transferred, but could not be achieved in a reproducible way.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom