z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Task complexity and maximal isometric strength gains through motor learning
Author(s) -
McGuire Jessica,
Green Lara A.,
Gabriel David A.
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
physiological reports
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.918
H-Index - 39
ISSN - 2051-817X
DOI - 10.14814/phy2.12218
Subject(s) - isometric exercise , coactivation , wrist , contraction (grammar) , mathematics , muscle contraction , electromyography , medicine , physical medicine and rehabilitation , physical therapy , anatomy
This study compared the effects of a simple versus complex contraction pattern on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of maximal isometric strength gains and reductions in force variability. A control group ( N  = 12) performed simple isometric contractions of the wrist flexors. An experimental group ( N  = 12) performed complex proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) contractions consisting of maximal isometric wrist extension immediately reversing force direction to wrist flexion within a single trial. Ten contractions were completed on three consecutive days with a retention and transfer test 2‐weeks later. For the retention test, the groups performed their assigned contraction pattern followed by a transfer test that consisted of the other contraction pattern for a cross‐over design. Both groups exhibited comparable increases in strength (20.2%, P  < 0.01) and reductions in mean torque variability (26.2%, P  < 0.01), which were retained and transferred. There was a decrease in the coactivation ratio (antagonist/agonist muscle activity) for both groups, which was retained and transferred (35.2%, P  < 0.01). The experimental group exhibited a linear decrease in variability of the torque‐ and sEMG ‐time curves, indicating transfer to the simple contraction pattern ( P  < 0.01). The control group underwent a decrease in variability of the torque‐ and sEMG ‐time curves from the first day of training to retention, but participants returned to baseline levels during the transfer condition ( P  < 0.01). However, the difference between torque RMS error versus the variability in torque‐ and sEMG ‐time curves suggests the demands of the complex task were transferred, but could not be achieved in a reproducible way.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here