z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Influence of neglecting the curved path of the Achilles tendon on Achilles tendon length change at various ranges of motion
Author(s) -
Fukutani Atsuki,
Hashizume Satoru,
Kusumoto Kazuki,
Kurihara Toshiyuki
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
physiological reports
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.918
H-Index - 39
ISSN - 2051-817X
DOI - 10.14814/phy2.12176
Subject(s) - achilles tendon , ankle , sagittal plane , tendon , physics , anatomy , medicine , orthodontics
Achilles tendon length has been measured using a straight‐line model. However, this model is associated with a greater measurement error compared with a curved‐line model. Therefore, we examined the influence of neglecting the curved path of the Achilles tendon on its length change at various ranges of motion. Ten male subjects participated in this study. First, the location of the Achilles tendon was confirmed by using ultrasonography, and markers were attached on the skin over the Achilles tendon path. Then, the three‐dimensional coordinates of each marker at dorsiflexion ( DF ) 15°, plantarflexion ( PF ) 0°, PF 15°, and PF 30° were obtained. Achilles tendon length in the curved‐line model was calculated as the sum of the distances among each marker. On the other hand, Achilles tendon length in the straight‐line model was calculated as the straight distance between the two most proximal and distal markers projected onto the sagittal plane. The difference of the Achilles tendon length change between curved‐line and straight‐line models was calculated by subtracting the Achilles tendon length change obtained in curved‐line model from that obtained in straight‐line model with three different ranges of motion (i.e., PF 0°, PF 15°, and PF 30° from DF 15°, respectively). As a result, the difference in Achilles tendon length change between the two models increased significantly as the range of motion increased. In conclusion, neglecting the curved path of the Achilles tendon induces substantial overestimation of its length change when the extent of ankle joint angle change is large.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here