z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Maintenance of Competence in Cardiovascular Training and Practices: Worth the Effort?
Author(s) -
John E. Brush,
William J. Oetgen
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
methodist debakey cardiovascular journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.552
H-Index - 23
eISSN - 1947-6094
pISSN - 1947-6108
DOI - 10.14797/mdcj-16-3-199
Subject(s) - competence (human resources) , accreditation , medicine , certification , core competency , graduate medical education , maintenance of certification , medical education , medical knowledge , management , economics
Americans expect their doctors to have the competence to deliver high-quality care and expect safeguards to be in place that assure their doctors are competent. However, competence requires knowledge, and people have trouble assessing their own knowledge and level of competence. Because external assessment is required, several organizations have taken on the roles of defining and assuring medical competence. For example, professional organizations such as the American College of Cardiology (ACC) have developed consensus documents that define core competencies for cardiologists. External organizations such as the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) have defined training requirements for cardiologists, and the ABIM has developed a process to certify that physicians maintain their competence, although the process has generated considerable criticism from the profession. Recently, the ACC and ABIM have worked together to make the certification process less onerous and more meaningful. This paper provides a brief summary of the history and ongoing efforts to assure the competence of cardiologists.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here