z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Dyskursywizm archeologii według Henryka Mamzera: ograniczenia orientacji konstruktywistycznej a mit etniczny w archeologii
Author(s) -
Sebastian Urbaniak
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
folia praehistorica posnaniensia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2450-5846
pISSN - 0239-8524
DOI - 10.14746/fpp.2020.25.15
Subject(s) - constructivism (international relations) , epistemology , philosophy , computer science , mathematics education , calculus (dental) , sociology , psychology , political science , medicine , law , international relations , politics , dentistry
Henryk Mamzer’s conception is an interesting new contribution to the development of socalled constructivist approaches in archaeology. As such it is a good example of the basic assumptions underlying its theory and methodology. In this article I will argue with some basic assumptions of Mamzer’s theory, trying to show that constructivism doesn’t rescue archaeology from the problems, which he would like to avoid. In fact, it deals with the same problems.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here