z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Artefact collecting: creating or destroying the archaeological record?
Author(s) -
Paul Barford
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
folia praehistorica posnaniensia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2450-5846
pISSN - 0239-8524
DOI - 10.14746/fpp.2020.25.02
Subject(s) - archaeology , archaeological record , archaeological evidence , history , historical record , historical archaeology , art history , memoir
This paper examines some of the arguments used by archaeologists in favour of collaborating useful for archaeological research and is a form of public engagement with archaeology. It takes as a case study records of 48 600 medieval artefacts removed from archaeological contexts by artefact hunters and recorded by the Portable Antiquities Scheme in England and Wales. The past and potential uses of these records as an archaeological source are objectively reviewed, together with an assessment of the degree to which they provide mitigation of the damage caused to the otherwise unthreatened archaeological record. It is concluded that, although information can be obtained by studying records of findspots of addressed artefacts such as coins, in general the claims made in support of professional archaeological collaboration with this kind of activity prove to be false.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here