z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Scientifically unfounded precaution drives European Commission’s recommendations on EDC regulation, while defying common sense, well-established science and risk assessment principles
Author(s) -
Daniel R. Dietrich,
Sonja von Aulock,
H Marquardt,
Bas J. Blaauboer,
W. Dekant,
James P. Kehrer,
Jan G. Hengstler,
Abby C. Collier,
Gio Batta Gori,
Olavi Pelkonen,
Florian Lang,
Frans P. Nijkamp,
Kerstin Stemmer,
Albert Li,
Kai Savolainen,
A. Wallace Hayes,
Nigel J. Gooderham,
Alan L. Harvey
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
altex/alternatives to animal experimentation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.975
H-Index - 51
eISSN - 1868-8551
pISSN - 1868-596X
DOI - 10.14573/altex.2013.3.381
Subject(s) - common sense , european commission , commission , risk analysis (engineering) , political science , law and economics , engineering ethics , environmental ethics , epistemology , law , engineering , business , sociology , european union , philosophy , international trade

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here