Open AccessPerformance Models in Higher Education
Author(s) -
Janet AtkinsonGrosjean,
Garnet Grosjean
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
education policy analysis archives
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.727
H-Index - 46
ISSN - 1068-2341
DOI - 10.14507/epaa.v8n30.2000
Subject(s) - governmentality , accountability , ideology , sociology , context (archaeology) , state (computer science) , higher education , public administration , field (mathematics) , set (abstract data type) , public relations , political science , politics , law , paleontology , mathematics , algorithm , computer science , pure mathematics , biology , programming language
Higher education (HE) administrators worldwide are responding to performance-based state agendas for public institutions. Largely ideologically-driven, this international fixation on performance is also advanced by the operation of isomorphic forces within HE's institutional field. Despite broad agreements on the validity of performance goals, there is no "one best" model or predictable set of consequences. Context matters. Responses are conditioned by each nation's historical and cultural institutional legacy. To derive a generalized set of consequences, issues, and impacts, we used a comparative international format to examine the way performance models are applied in the United States, England, Australia, New Zealand, Sweden, and the Netherlands. Our theoretical framework draws on understandings of performance measures as normalizing instruments of governmentality in the "evaluative state," supplemented by field theory of organizations. Our conclusion supports Gerard Delanty's contention, that universities need to redefine accountability in a way that repositions them at the heart of their social and civic communities.