z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Common clinical dilemmas in left ventricular assist device therapy: A glimpse into current trends
Author(s) -
Ahmet Kilic,
Matthew C. Kiernan,
Meredith A. BriscoBacik,
Sangjin Lee,
Behzad Soleimani,
Aditya Bansal,
Igor Gošev,
Peter Eckman,
Brian Lima,
Brian Bethea,
Chetan B. Patel,
Jason N. Katz,
Jonathan D. Rich,
Susan Joseph
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
the vad journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2378-2706
DOI - 10.14434/vad.v3i0.27973
Subject(s) - ventricular assist device , medicine , destination therapy , best practice , intensive care medicine , heart failure , medical emergency , management , economics
Background Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy has been thrust into the forefront of surgical treatment for advanced heart failure (HF). Despite advancements in survival and quality of life with these devices, the multi-disciplinary care for these patients remains far from standardized across institutions. Methods A survey of current practices in LVAD was carried out at the St. Jude Medical User’s meeting representing a variety of caregivers including cardiac surgeons, HF cardiologists, non-HF cardiologists, advanced practice providers and ventricular assist device coordinators, with representation from several continents. Utilizing an audience response system, eleven questions were asked related to the demographics of the audience, left ventricular assist device patient selection and patient management. Results A total of 120 audience members representing both transplant and LVAD centers, destination therapy only LVAD centers and non-implanting, shared care centers across a multitude of disciplines responded to the survey. Questions comprised of patient selection (body mass index, pre-existing renal failure, care giver presence and abstinence from substance abuse) and patient management (anticoagulation regimens, first line therapy for hemolysis, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator usage and route of preferred dialysis) issues. Conclusions LVAD technology will continue to change and improve with the next generation of pumps on the horizon. Progress cannot be made without pausing to understand the current state of technology, practice patterns and patient determinants of success. This survey underscores the lack of consensus regarding best practice principles and the need for an increased focus on care management for LVAD patients with collaborative, multi-institutional studies.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here