
Distinguishing Features of Funds of Knowledge, Curriculum of Lives, Habitus, and Discourses
Author(s) -
Mary Rice
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
international journal of literacy, culture, and language education
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2642-4002
DOI - 10.14434/ijlcle.v2i0.26897
Subject(s) - habitus , affordance , narrative , narrative inquiry , narratology , sociology , qualitative research , curriculum , literacy , space (punctuation) , conceptual framework , pedagogy , epistemology , psychology , social science , computer science , literature , cognitive psychology , art , philosophy , cultural capital , operating system
This paper explores the affordances and limitations of several popular conceptual frameworks often used in qualitative literacy research, especially that where narratives are used as data. These frameworks are Funds of Knowledge, Curriculum of Lives, Habitus, and Discourses. The author draws on the narratology of Bal to open space for comparing these frameworks, and through a sample analysis of one narrative, exposes underlying assumptions the frameworks reveal about relationships in research, literacy, and narrative analysis.