
Treating Museum Objects as Text: A Case Study
Author(s) -
Kirsten Hébert
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
hindsight
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2374-3271
pISSN - 2374-3263
DOI - 10.14434/hindsight.v49i4.25914
Subject(s) - historiography , scholarship , meaning (existential) , context (archaeology) , assemblage (archaeology) , foundation (evidence) , power (physics) , museology , order (exchange) , visual arts , history , sociology , library science , art , epistemology , political science , computer science , archaeology , law , philosophy , business , physics , finance , quantum mechanics
Medical instrument collections are neglected primary source material that can be used to produce original scholarship on thehistory of medicine and the history of optometry. Opening museum collections and associated archives to researchers allowscollections managers to simultaneously address curatorial backlogs, facilitate research, and provide a foundation for craftingpublic-facing exhibits. In order to add to the historiography, research should not only focus on the technical aspects of theinstruments, but also employ theory to examine of the meaning of the objects in context. In this way, objects can be a vehicle forunderstanding broader themes in the history of medicine and reveal their utility as material evidence of the impact of medicineon society and culture. This two-part article includes a historiography of ophthalmic instruments and a case study in which an assemblage of ophthalmometers in the Archives & Museum of Optometry collection are treated as “text” to explore the nature of power in the doctor-patient relationship in early optometry.