Open AccessValidation of leak test models for pharmaceutical isolators
Author(s) -
Shih−Cheng Hu,
Angus Shiue,
Yu-Min Hsu,
Yi-Sung Ke
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
international journal of engineering and technology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2227-524X
DOI - 10.14419/ijet.v4i2.4432
Subject(s) - leak , isolator , leakage (economics) , airflow , mechanics , particle (ecology) , materials science , tracer , chemistry , environmental science , nuclear engineering , analytical chemistry (journal) , chromatography , engineering , electrical engineering , mechanical engineering , environmental engineering , geology , physics , oceanography , nuclear physics , economics , macroeconomics
In this study, we performed three leak tests on a side-recirculated air isolator: a particle-count test, performed at a variety of positive and negative pressures; the SF6 trace gas method, performed at a variety of airflow velocities; and a pressure decay method, performed at a variety of initial pressures. From the particle-count test, we measured particle leak ratios of 30–34% for pressures of −18 to −25 Pa. In contrast, using the SF6 tracer gas method. we measured leak ratios of 7.8%, 5.9%, and 3.8% for airflow velocities of 0.61, 0.51, and 0.41 m/s, respectively. The particle-count test detected leaks quickly and easily, but its leak ratio was overly high because it included particles from outside of the chamber as well as from the filter. Although the SF6 tracer gas method took more time, it was more sensitive and accurate. The leak quantity would be affected by air velocity and the pressure. Leak concentration acted as sterilization phase of isolator that would result in concentration distributed nonhomogeneous phenomena; concentration distributed from outside of the chamber can be acted as a leakage diffusion situation of contaminants leak. Using the pressure decay method to compare downward airflow through a raised-floor and side-wall return air isolators, the fall time, leak quantity, and leak area of the downward airflow through a raised-floor isolator was five times greater, four times les, and 4.5 times less than that of the side-wall return-air isolator, respectively. According to idea gas law, keeping the temperature and pressure of the chamber constant will effectively reduce the leak quantity.