Open AccessClinical gestational age assessment in newborns using the new Ballard score
Author(s) -
Erman Erman,
Wayan Retayasa,
Soetjiningsih Soetjiningsih
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
paediatrica indonesiana
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2338-476X
pISSN - 0030-9311
DOI - 10.14238/pi46.3.2006.97-101
Subject(s) - medicine , gestational age , standard score , pediatrics , gold standard (test) , birth weight , small for gestational age , obstetrics , pregnancy , genetics , biology , machine learning , computer science
Background The new Ballard score (NBS) is presently consid-ered to be the most reliable method for estimating clinical gesta-tional age (GA) in newborn infants.Objective The aim of this study was to compare the NBS andDubowitz/Finnstrom score against ultrasonography assessment ofgestational age.Methods A cross sectional randomized study involving neonatesborn in Sanglah Hospital, Bali, June to August 2004 was carriedout. Gestational age was estimated within the first 24 hour by ei-ther Dubowitz/Finnstrom score or NBS confirmed by USG (C-GLMP) as the gold standard.Results One hundred and fifty-five newborns were enrolled in thisstudy. Subjects were randomly divided into two groups, theDubowitz/Finnstrom score group (76 newborns) and NBS group(79 newborns). The mean age of mothers was 28.4 years old; meanbirth weight was 3151.3 g (SD 596.3 g). The proportion of small forGA, appropriate for GA, and large for GA were 6%, 77% and 17%,respectively. Pearson correlation ( r ) between C-GLMP andDubowitz/Finnstrom score was 0.71 (P<0.005); and with NBS was0.79 (P<0.005) .Conclusion The strength of correlation between either NBS orDubowitz/Finnstrom score and USG assessment of gestational ageare similar