z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Diagnosis of Rheumatic Fever: Which Modification?
Author(s) -
Bambang Madiyono,
Sudigdo Sastroasmoro,
Ismet N. Oesman,
Sukman Tulus Putra,
Najib Advani
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
paediatrica indonesiana
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2338-476X
pISSN - 0030-9311
DOI - 10.14238/pi34.5-6.1994.141-8
Subject(s) - medicine , rheumatic fever , chorea , acute rheumatic fever , arthritis , pediatrics , ambulatory , erythema , carditis , heart disease , cardiology , dermatology , disease
We evaluated the implementation of diagnostic criteria on 547 ambulatory patients with rheumatic fever (RF) and rheumatic heart disease (RHD) between January 1, 1983 and December 31, 1992. The diagnosis of RF and reactive RHD was established by either revised Jones criteria, modified Jones criteria, or clinical judgment The patient's age ranged from 4-18 years, 255 (46.6%) of them were boys. The clinical manifestations found were fever (58.1 %), arthritis (41.9%), chorea (8.6%), subcutaneous nodule (1.3%), erythema marginatum (1.1%), holosystolic murmur (56.9%), mid-diastolic murmur (25.4%), and early diastolic murmur (29.5%). The laboratory changes were hemoglobin 20 mm/h (56.30/o), ASTO >200 U (29.6%), PR interval> 0.16 sec (13.3%), and erR> 0.55 (27.6%). Revised Jones criteria were met in 162 cases (29%), modified criteria in 474 cases (86,6%), and clinical judgment in 521 cases (95.2%).

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here