z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Defining the Caribbean Area and Identity
Author(s) -
Zita Tézer
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
acta hispanica
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2676-9719
pISSN - 1416-7263
DOI - 10.14232/actahisp.2020.0.203-212
Subject(s) - sociocultural evolution , geopolitics , ethnography , colonialism , identity (music) , geography , caribbean region , anthropology , caribbean art , ethnology , politics , interpretation (philosophy) , cultural identity , sociology , gender studies , latin americans , archaeology , political science , social science , negotiation , physics , acoustics , law , computer science , programming language
In examining Caribbean identity, it is essential to examine the demarcation of the area, delimit the boundaries, assess how local people have defined or redefined themselves in space and time, and how this is influenced by economics and politics. Obviously the key is the geographic proximity of the Caribbean Sea and its history, which result in many similarities in time, but there is variation, and there are differences. Two significant researchers who investigated the most important common elements like colonization, plantation economy and slavery, Charles Wagley and Sidney Mintz cultural anthropologists, conducted their fieldwork in Brazil, Puerto Rico, Haiti and Jamaica. In defining the “Caribbean” within Plantation America cultural sphere, Charles Wagley took into account the geography, the environment, linguistics, the modes of production, the local histories. Both anthropologists made sociocultural, ethnographic and demographic analyses, comparing the colonial structures in the plantations to delimit the culturally identical area, which, however, today is not followed by geopolitical boundaries, nor is the locals' perceptions of their own interpretation about the Caribbean area.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here