
Jan Swammerdam and the limits of preformationism
Author(s) -
Miguel Escribano Cabeza
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
theoria
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2171-679X
pISSN - 0495-4548
DOI - 10.1387/theoria.20336
Subject(s) - vitalism , epistemology , perspective (graphical) , reading (process) , philosophy , sociology , environmental ethics , linguistics , computer science , medicine , alternative medicine , pathology , artificial intelligence
This paper takes an organicist perspective of Jan Swammerdam’s conception of metamorphis which allows us to identify a continuity betweem W. Harvey’s epigenetism and G.W. Leibniz’ preformationism – two historically opposed perspectives. In line with this reading, I provide a critical assessment of the different preformationist interpretations of Swammerdam. The thesis that I defend in this paper is that the idea of preformation does not imply so much a theory about the origin of the embryo but a model of ontogenetic development that cannot be catalogued as mechanistic or as vitalist.