z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Jan Swammerdam and the limits of preformationism
Author(s) -
Miguel Escribano Cabeza
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
theoria
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2171-679X
pISSN - 0495-4548
DOI - 10.1387/theoria.20336
Subject(s) - vitalism , epistemology , perspective (graphical) , reading (process) , philosophy , sociology , environmental ethics , linguistics , computer science , medicine , alternative medicine , pathology , artificial intelligence
This paper takes an organicist perspective of Jan Swammerdam’s conception of metamorphis which allows us to identify a continuity betweem W. Harvey’s epigenetism and G.W. Leibniz’ preformationism – two historically opposed perspectives. In line with this reading, I provide a critical assessment of the different preformationist interpretations of Swammerdam. The thesis that I defend in this paper is that the idea of preformation does not imply so much a theory about the origin of the embryo but a model of ontogenetic development that cannot be catalogued as mechanistic or as vitalist.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here