Open AccessYoung, free and biased: A comparison of mainstream and right-wing media coverage of the 2015–16 refugee crisis in German newspapers
Author(s) -
Gerret von Nordheim,
Henrik Høeg Müller,
Michael Scheppe
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of alternative and community media/journal of alternative and community media
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2634-4726
pISSN - 2206-5857
DOI - 10.1386/joacm_00042_1
Subject(s) - mainstream , newspaper , german , right wing , context (archaeology) , audience measurement , refugee crisis , refugee , political science , politics , extreme right , populism , media studies , sociology , law , history , archaeology
Right-wing media have been growing in terms of readership and impact in recent years. However, comparative analyses that gauge linkages between mainstream and right-wing media in Europe are virtually missing. We pursued an algorithm-based topic-modelling analysis of 11,420 articles concerning the question of whether reporting of the leading German right-wing newspaper Junge Freiheit differed from that of mainstream media outlets in the context of the refugee crisis of 201516. The results strongly support this notion. They show a clear-cut dichotomy with mainstream media on one side and Junge Freiheit on the other. A time lag could be found, pointing to a reporting pattern that positioned Junge Freiheit relative to the journalistic and political mainstream. Thus, Junge Freiheit can be characterised as a reactive alternative media outlet that is prone to populism: it stresses the national dimension of the crisis, embraces the positions of the right-wing party Alternative fr Deutschland (AfD) and largely neglects complex international, and particularly European, implications.