z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Direct-To-Consumer Telemedicine Visits For Acute Respiratory Infections Linked To More Downstream Visits
Author(s) -
Kathleen Yinran Li,
Ziwei Zhu,
Sophia Ng,
Chad Ellimoottil
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
health affairs
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.837
H-Index - 178
eISSN - 2694-233X
pISSN - 0278-2715
DOI - 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.01741
Subject(s) - telemedicine , medicine , health care , emergency medicine , medical emergency , emergency department , downstream (manufacturing) , business , nursing , marketing , economics , economic growth
Use of direct-to-consumer telemedicine-on-demand virtual care for minor medical issues-is growing rapidly. Although it may yield immediate savings by diverting health care from higher-cost settings, these savings could be countered if direct-to-consumer telemedicine increases follow-up care and, therefore, episode costs. Comparing downstream care utilization data from a large, commercial payer for the period 2016-19, we found that patients with initial visits for acute respiratory infection were more likely to obtain follow-up care within seven days after direct-to-consumer telemedicine visits (10.3 percent) than after in-person visits (5.9 percent). In both settings approximately 90 percent of patients did not obtain additional care. The telemedicine cohort had fewer (0.5 percent versus 0.6 percent) emergency department visits-a small but statistically significant difference-but more subsequent office, urgent care, and telemedicine visits. Our findings suggest that potential savings from shifting initial care to a direct-to-consumer telemedicine setting should be balanced against the potential for higher spending on downstream care.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here