Superior reproducibility and repeatability in automated quantitative pupillometry compared to standard manual assessment, and quantitative pupillary response parameters present high reliability in critically ill cardiac patients | Zendy

Benjamin Nyholm | Zendy; Laust Emil Roelsgaard Obling | Zendy; Christian Hassager | Zendy; Johannes Grand | Zendy; Jacob Eifer Møller | Zendy; Marwan Othman | Zendy; Daniel Kondziella | Zendy; Jesper Kjærgaard | Zendy

Open Access

Superior reproducibility and repeatability in automated quantitative pupillometry compared to standard manual assessment, and quantitative pupillary response parameters present high reliability in critically ill cardiac patients

Author(s) -

Benjamin Nyholm,

Laust Emil Roelsgaard Obling,

Christian Hassager,

Johannes Grand,

Jacob Eifer Møller,

Marwan Othman,

Daniel Kondziella,

Jesper Kjærgaard

Publication year - 2022

Publication title -

plos one

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 0.99

H-Index - 332

ISSN - 1932-6203

DOI - 10.1371/journal.pone.0272303

Subject(s) - pupillometry , repeatability , reproducibility , reliability (semiconductor) , critically ill , medicine , computer science , pupillary response , pupil , reliability engineering , intensive care medicine , statistics , biology , mathematics , engineering , neuroscience , power (physics) , physics , quantum mechanics

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research