z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Superior reproducibility and repeatability in automated quantitative pupillometry compared to standard manual assessment, and quantitative pupillary response parameters present high reliability in critically ill cardiac patients
Author(s) -
Benjamin Nyholm,
Laust Obling,
Christian Hassager,
Johannes Grand,
Jacob Eifer Møller,
Marwan Othman,
Daniel Kondziella,
Jesper Kjærgaard
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
plos one
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.99
H-Index - 332
ISSN - 1932-6203
DOI - 10.1371/journal.pone.0272303
Subject(s) - pupillometry , repeatability , reproducibility , intraclass correlation , reliability (semiconductor) , medicine , confidence interval , pupil , limits of agreement , bland–altman plot , quantitative assessment , statistics , psychology , nuclear medicine , mathematics , physics , quantum mechanics , neuroscience , risk analysis (engineering) , power (physics)

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here