Open Access
Enhancing human aspects of care with young people with muscular dystrophy: An evaluation of a participatory qualitative study with clinicians
Author(s) -
Jenny Setchell,
Donya Mosleh,
Laura McAdam,
Patricia Thille,
Thomas Abrams,
Hugh J. McMillan,
Bhavnita Mistry,
Barbara E. Gibson
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
plos one
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.99
H-Index - 332
ISSN - 1932-6203
DOI - 10.1371/journal.pone.0263956
Subject(s) - dialogical self , intervention (counseling) , participatory action research , qualitative research , medicine , rehabilitation , psychology , nursing , physical therapy , social psychology , sociology , anthropology , social science
Purpose This paper evaluates a study which aimed to enhance clinical care of young people with Duchenne or Becker muscular dystrophy (MD) and their families in two Canadian neuromuscular clinics. We report on how/why the study changed clinical practices in relation to the ‘human’ (e.g., emotional, social, existential, cultural) dimensions of living with MD. Materials and methods The intervention involved regular dialogical exchanges with clinicians across the two sites, during which direct observations of the clinics’ care practices were discussed and changes were planned. We drew from realist evaluation approaches to assess changes in clinical care associated with the intervention. Data sources included dialogical exchanges; clinic observations; interviews with clients, families and clinicians; and team analysis sessions. Results Our evaluation suggests the clinical teams shifted their thinking and practices towards greater consideration of human aspects of living with MD including: more routinely attending to emotional, social and experiential dimensions of living with MD; reconceptualisation of risk; and considerations of affective aspects of clinical care. Not all clinicians changed their thinking and practices in the same ways, or to the same extent, and there were differences between the sites. These differences were likely due to numerous factors, including varying levels of clinician comfort with examining and shifting their own practices, and differing formal and informal clinic routines at each site. Conclusions Overall, this intervention was able to shift clinic practices, and could feasibly be adapted across rehabilitation settings.