z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Nutritional status and body composition in cognitively impaired older persons living alone: The Takashimadaira study
Author(s) -
Masanori Iwasaki,
Köiti Motokawa,
Yutaka Watanabe,
Misato Hayakawa,
Yoshiki Mikami,
Maki Shirobe,
Hiroki Inagaki,
Ayako Edahiro,
Yuki Ohara,
Hirohiko Hirano,
Shoji Shinkai,
Shuichi Awata
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
plos one
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.99
H-Index - 332
ISSN - 1932-6203
DOI - 10.1371/journal.pone.0260412
Subject(s) - odds ratio , confidence interval , anthropometry , medicine , confounding , body mass index , logistic regression , gerontology , cognition , cognitive impairment , cross sectional study , psychiatry , pathology
Objectives To investigate nutritional status and body composition in cognitively impaired older persons living alone. Methods This cross-sectional study included 1051 older adults (633 women and 418 men, mean age: 77.1 years) from the Takashimadaira study. The study participants were categorized according to whether they lived alone, which was confirmed via questionnaire, and had cognitive impairment, which was defined as having a Mini Mental State Examination-Japanese score ≤23. Nutritional status was evaluated using the serum albumin level. The fat-free mass index (FFMI) was calculated based on anthropometric and body composition measurements. A logistic regression model with the outcome of a low serum albumin level (serum albumin <4 g/dL) and low FFMI (<16 kg/m 2 in men and <14 kg/m 2 in women) were used to analyze the data. Results The percentages of participants in the living alone (-)/cognitive impairment (-) group, the living alone (+)/cognitive impairment (-) group, the living alone (-)/cognitive impairment (+) group, and the living alone (+)/cognitive impairment (+) group were 54.8%, 37.3%, 5.6%, and 2.3%, respectively. Compared to the living alone (-)/cognitive impairment (-) group, the living alone (+)/cognitive impairment (+) group was more likely to have a low serum albumin level (adjusted odds ratio = 3.10, 95% confidence interval = 1.31 to 7.33) and low FFMI (adjusted odds ratio = 2.79, 95% confidence interval = 1.10 to 7.06) after adjusting for potential confounders. Conclusion Cognitively impaired older adults living alone had poorer nutrition than cognitively normal and cohabitating persons in this study. Our results highlight the importance of paying extra attention to nutritional status for this group of community-dwelling older adults.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here