Open AccessDetection of Helicobacter Pylori infection by invasive and non-invasive techniques in patients with gastrointestinal diseases from Iraq: A validation study
Author(s) -
Rawaa Abdulkhaleq Hussein,
Mushtak T.S. Al-Ouqaili,
Yasin H. Majeed
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
plos one
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.99
H-Index - 332
ISSN - 1932-6203
DOI - 10.1371/journal.pone.0256393
Subject(s) - gold standard (test) , helicobacter pylori , caga , urea breath test , serology , rapid urease test , gastroenterology , medicine , polymerase chain reaction , positive predicative value , real time polymerase chain reaction , immunology , gastritis , biology , helicobacter pylori infection , predictive value , antibody , virulence , biochemistry , gene
There is still no agreement on the gold standard technique for diagnosing of H . Pylori in Iraq, as well as a paucity of data on the validity of different diagnostic techniques. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of this bacterium with different methods and compare them to the quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) as a golden standard technique among Iraqi patients. In total, 115 Iraqi patients strongly suspected of H . pylori infection were enrolled in the current study. Invasive techniques including rapid urease testing (RUT) and gastric tissue culture in addition to non-invasive techniques including 14 C-Urea breath test ( 14 C-UBT), stool antigen test (SAT), CagA-IgG serology, and qPCR were performed to confirm the H . pylori infection. The qPCR was used as the gold standard to estimate the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values for the studied diagnostic tests. Overall, the prevalence rate of H . pylori in Iraqi patients was ranged from 47.8 to 70.4% using different methods. The positive results for each test were as follows: qPCR 81, (70.4%) UBT 79 (68.7%), SAT 77 (67%), RUT 76 (66.1%), Cag-IgG 61 (53%), and culture 55 (47.8%). The 14 C-UBT showed the highest overall performance with 97.5% sensitivity, 97% specificity, and total accuracy of 97.3% followed by SAT, RUT, Cag-IgG, and culture method. Based on the accuracy of the studied methods for H . pylori detection, they can be arranged in order as follows: qPCR > UBT > SAT > RUT> CagA IgG > culture. Since a universal gold standard assay for the diagnosis of H . pylori has not yet been established in Iraq, the UBT may be recommended as first choice due to its higher performance compared to other methods.