Open AccessDesign and psychometric evaluation of schools’ resilience tool in Emergencies and disasters: A mixed-method
Author(s) -
Samaneh Mirzaei,
Leila Mohammadinia,
Khadijeh Nasiriani,
Abbas Ali Dehghani Tafti,
Zohreh Rahaei,
Hossein Falahzade,
Hamid Reza Amiri,
Hamid Sharif Nia,
M. H. Dehghani
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
plos one
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.99
H-Index - 332
ISSN - 1932-6203
DOI - 10.1371/journal.pone.0253906
Subject(s) - exploratory factor analysis , confirmatory factor analysis , resilience (materials science) , reliability (semiconductor) , applied psychology , poison control , psychology , content validity , population , psychological resilience , psychometrics , computer science , clinical psychology , medicine , environmental health , social psychology , structural equation modeling , machine learning , power (physics) , physics , quantum mechanics , thermodynamics
Background In addition to their educational role, resilient schools have a good capacity in response to disasters. Due to the large student population, the schools can be a safe and secure environment during disasters, in addition to maintaining their performance after. Given the role and importance of the schools, the impact of culture and environment on resilience, without any indigenous and comprehensive tool for measuring the resilience in Iran, the study aimed to design and psychometrically evaluate the measurement tools. Method This study was conducted using a mixed-method sequential explanatory approach. The research was conducted in two main phases of production on items based on hybrid model and the psychometric evaluation of the tool. The second phase included validity (formal, content and construction) and reliability (multiplex internal similarity, consistency and reliability). Result The integration of systematic and qualitative steps resulted in entering 91 items into the pool of items. After formal and content validity, 73 items remained and 44 were omitted in exploratory factor analysis. A questionnaire with 5 factors explained 52.08% of total variance. Finally, after the confirmatory factor analysis, the questionnaire was extracted with 29 questions and 5 factors including "functional", "architectural", "equipment", "education" and "safety". Internal similarity and stability in all factors were evaluated as good. Conclusion The result showed that the 29-item questionnaire of school resilience in emergencies and disasters is valid and reliable, that can be used to evaluate school resilience. On the other hand, the questionnaire on assessment of school resilience in disasters enables intervention to improve its capacity.