z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Is a higher altitude associated with shorter survival among at-risk neonates?
Author(s) -
Iván Dueñas-Espín,
Luciana Armijos-Acurio,
Estefanía Espín,
Fernando Espinosa-Herrera,
Ruth Jimbo,
Ángela León Cáceres,
Raif Gregorio Nasre-Nasser,
M Rivadeneira,
David RojasRueda,
Laura Ruiz-Cedeño,
Betzabé Tello,
Daniela Vásconez-Romero
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
plos one
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.99
H-Index - 332
ISSN - 1932-6203
DOI - 10.1371/journal.pone.0253413
Subject(s) - medicine , gestational age , proportional hazards model , birth weight , hazard ratio , survival analysis , demography , pediatrics , christian ministry , retrospective cohort study , public health , environmental health , emergency medicine , pregnancy , confidence interval , sociology , biology , philosophy , genetics , theology , nursing
We hypothesize that high altitudes could have an adverse effect on neonatal health outcomes, especially among at-risk neonates. The current study aims to assess the association between higher altitudes on survival time among at-risk neonates. Methods Retrospective survival analysis. Setting: Ecuadorian neonates who died at ≤28 days of life. Patients: We analyzed the nationwide dataset of neonatal deaths from the Surveillance System of Neonatal Mortality of the Ministry of Public Health of Ecuador, registered from 126 public and private health care facilities, between January 2014 to September 2017. Main outcome measures: We retrospectively reviewed 3016 patients. We performed a survival analysis by setting the survival time in days as the primary outcome and fixed and mixed-effects Cox proportional hazards models to estimate hazard ratios (HR) for each altitude stratum of each one of the health care facilities in which those neonates were attended, adjusting by individual variables ( i . e ., birth weight, gestational age at birth, Apgar scale at 5 minutes, and comorbidities); and contextual variables ( i . e ., administrative planning areas, type of health care facility, and level of care). Results Altitudes of health care facilities ranging from 80 to <2500 m, 2500 to <2750m, and ≥2750 m were associated respectively with 20% (95% CI: 1% to 44%), 32% (95% CI:<1% to 79%) and 37% (95% CI: 8% to 75%) increased HR; compared with altitudes at <80 m. Conclusion Higher altitudes are independently associated with shorter survival time, as measured by days among at-risk neonates. Altitude should be considered when assessing the risk of having negative health outcomes during neonatal period.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here