Open AccessComparison of biomechanical performance of single-level triangular and quadrilateral profile anterior cervical plates
Author(s) -
Fu Cao,
Rongchang Fu,
Wenyuan Wang
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
plos one
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.99
H-Index - 332
ISSN - 1932-6203
DOI - 10.1371/journal.pone.0250270
Subject(s) - quadrilateral , anterior cervical discectomy and fusion , slippage , stress (linguistics) , materials science , displacement (psychology) , orthodontics , medicine , geology , cervical spine , composite material , finite element method , surgery , structural engineering , engineering , linguistics , philosophy , psychology , psychotherapist
The quadrilateral anterior cervical plate (ACP) is used extensively in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) to reconstruct the stability of the cervical spine and prevent cage subsidence. However, there have been no comparison studies on the biomechanical performance of quadrilateral ACP and triangular ACP. The objective of this study is to investigate the functional outcomes of quadrilateral ACP and triangular ACP usage in ACDF surgery. In this study, a finite element model of intact C1-C7 segments was established and verified. Additionally, two implant systems were built; one using triangle anterior cervical plates (TACP) and another using quadrilateral orion anterior cervical plate (QACP). Both models were then compared in terms of their postoperative biomechanical performance, under normal and excessive motion. Compared to QACP, the peak stress of the TACP screws and plates occurred at 359.2 MPa and 97.2 MPa respectively and were the highest during over extension exercises. Alternately, compared to TACP, the endplate peak stress and the cage displacement of QACP were the largest at over extension, with values of 7.5 MPa and 1.2 mm, respectively. Finally, the average stress ratio of bone grafts in TACP was relatively high at 31.6%. In terms of biomechanical performance, TACP can share the load more flexibly and reduce the risks of cage subsidence and slippage but the screws have high peak stress value, thereby increasing the risk of screw slippage and fracture. This disadvantage must be considered when designing a TACP based implant for a potential patient.