z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Artificial intelligence for the classification of fractures around the knee in adults according to the 2018 AO/OTA classification system
Author(s) -
Anna Lind,
Ehsan Akbarian,
Simon Olsson,
Hans Nåsell,
Olof Sköldenberg,
Ali Sharif Razavian,
Max Gordon
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
plos one
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.99
H-Index - 332
ISSN - 1932-6203
DOI - 10.1371/journal.pone.0248809
Subject(s) - medicine , radiography , artificial intelligence , orthopedic surgery , knee joint , tibia , artificial neural network , fracture (geology) , machine learning , orthodontics , computer science , surgery , geology , geotechnical engineering
Background Fractures around the knee joint are inherently complex in terms of treatment; complication rates are high, and they are difficult to diagnose on a plain radiograph. An automated way of classifying radiographic images could improve diagnostic accuracy and would enable production of uniformly classified records of fractures to be used in researching treatment strategies for different fracture types. Recently deep learning, a form of artificial intelligence (AI), has shown promising results for interpreting radiographs. In this study, we aim to evaluate how well an AI can classify knee fractures according to the detailed 2018 AO-OTA fracture classification system. Methods We selected 6003 radiograph exams taken at Danderyd University Hospital between the years 2002–2016, and manually categorized them according to the AO/OTA classification system and by custom classifiers. We then trained a ResNet-based neural network on this data. We evaluated the performance against a test set of 600 exams. Two senior orthopedic surgeons had reviewed these exams independently where we settled exams with disagreement through a consensus session. Results We captured a total of 49 nested fracture classes. Weighted mean AUC was 0.87 for proximal tibia fractures, 0.89 for patella fractures and 0.89 for distal femur fractures. Almost ¾ of AUC estimates were above 0.8, out of which more than half reached an AUC of 0.9 or above indicating excellent performance. Conclusion Our study shows that neural networks can be used not only for fracture identification but also for more detailed classification of fractures around the knee joint.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here